PROJECTS / LAW COURTS JERUSALEM
Decision for a Different Architectural Expression
Christoph Ingenhoven emphasizes that the architecture of this multifunctional institution transcends cultural and traditional boundaries, uniting diverse backgrounds. Just as the beauty of intact nature is universally cherished, the integration of gardening within the building serves as a common denominator. The design weaves together various architectural and legal traditions, centered around two universally understood concepts: humanity's connection with nature and interpersonal relationships.
Rather than imposing an intimidating, hierarchical structure in the tradition of classical temple fronts or their neo-classical revivals, Christoph Ingenhoven's design opts for a different architectural expression. Instead of projecting authority, the design conveys a space where all participants in a court trial share the same realm, emphasizing equality. Nature, seen as the root of ethics, morality, and law, is a universal concept understood by all cultures. This building is not about top-down power but about people meeting as equals to discuss the issues faced by society.
The layout is clear, promoting easy orientation and navigation. The two main areas—the courts and the judges/administration—are distinct yet unified by an open central spine, making the building an "open house" architecturally. While it does not follow the tradition of a temple-like court building or a grand "palace of justice," it redefines and elevates the modernist "box" design. Views of the city and roof gardens create a focus, with a canopy structure providing shade and symbolizing equality under one roof. The building's architecture is light, elegant, and transparent, balancing local security needs with a sense of fairness and openness. The design promotes transparency, helping the public understand the judicial process, rather than hiding it from view, while still respecting the legitimate need for privacy.
Data
Competition 2013
GFA 50.00m²